https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156908 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case. Despite the High Court disbelieving eyewitness testimonies, the Supreme Court found them credible and consistent with other evidence. Criticizing the High Court for minor discrepancies, the Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's conviction, emphasizing the duty of the judiciary to discern truth from falsehood. The Court reiterated its limited power under Article 136 of the Constitution but intervened due to the unreasonable nature of the High Court's acquittal. The accused was ordered to serve the remaining sentence, highlighting the importance of fair evidence evaluation in criminal trials. en-us Fri, 26 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156908 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case. Despite the High Court disbelieving eyewitness testimonies, the Supreme Court found them credible and consistent with other evidence. Criticizing the High Court for minor discrepancies, the Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's conviction, emphasizing the duty of the judiciary to discern truth from falsehood. The Court reiterated its limited power under Article 136 of the Constitution but intervened due to the unreasonable nature of the High Court's acquittal. The accused was ordered to serve the remaining sentence, highlighting the importance of fair evidence evaluation in criminal trials. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156908