<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 351 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156903</link>
    <description>Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the executing court to decide disputes relating to execution, discharge or satisfaction of the decree, including whether a claimant is a representative of a party or claims title by operation of law. In the context of a municipal auction sale, the prescribed time for depositing the balance purchase money was mandatory; delayed payment beyond that period had no legal effect and the sale stood annulled by operation of law. As a result, the auction purchaser acquired no valid interest in the property and could not seek substitution as a transferee under Order 21 Rule 16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 351 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156903</link>
      <description>Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the executing court to decide disputes relating to execution, discharge or satisfaction of the decree, including whether a claimant is a representative of a party or claims title by operation of law. In the context of a municipal auction sale, the prescribed time for depositing the balance purchase money was mandatory; delayed payment beyond that period had no legal effect and the sale stood annulled by operation of law. As a result, the auction purchaser acquired no valid interest in the property and could not seek substitution as a transferee under Order 21 Rule 16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>