<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 473 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156899</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 85 and the consequences of non-compliance. The Court directed appropriate relief and restoration of possession to the judgment-debtor, while ensuring the appellant received the decretal amount and part of the deposits made. The appeal was dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 10,000/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 473 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156899</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 85 and the consequences of non-compliance. The Court directed appropriate relief and restoration of possession to the judgment-debtor, while ensuring the appellant received the decretal amount and part of the deposits made. The appeal was dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 10,000/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>