https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156896 Failure by auction-purchasers to pay the balance 75% of the purchase money within the statutory time under the Punjab Land Revenue Act rendered the auction-sale void, because the deposit and payment requirements were mandatory and no extension of time was permissible; acceptance of belated payment and later confirmation could not validate a sale already ineffective in law. A civil suit to protect possession and challenge the sale certificate was not barred by the ouster provision, because a civil court is not excluded where the revenue authority acts without jurisdiction on the basis of a void sale. The sale certificate conferred no legal right on the purchasers, and the suit was maintainable. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156896 Failure by auction-purchasers to pay the balance 75% of the purchase money within the statutory time under the Punjab Land Revenue Act rendered the auction-sale void, because the deposit and payment requirements were mandatory and no extension of time was permissible; acceptance of belated payment and later confirmation could not validate a sale already ineffective in law. A civil suit to protect possession and challenge the sale certificate was not barred by the ouster provision, because a civil court is not excluded where the revenue authority acts without jurisdiction on the basis of a void sale. The sale certificate conferred no legal right on the purchasers, and the suit was maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156896