<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 325 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156888</link>
    <description>For declared goods, the taxable stage under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was the last sale or purchase within the State, so a licensed dealer selling to an unlicensed purchaser remained the last dealer liable to tax; section 9(4) did not defeat that liability merely because the goods were later dealt with by another licensed dealer. The dealer was also estopped from disputing the genuineness of sales already shown in its returns and from later describing them as accommodation transactions. On the facts found, suppression of material particulars justified reassessment, extended limitation and disallowance of deductions, and the Revenue&#039;s stand was upheld on all referred questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 325 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156888</link>
      <description>For declared goods, the taxable stage under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was the last sale or purchase within the State, so a licensed dealer selling to an unlicensed purchaser remained the last dealer liable to tax; section 9(4) did not defeat that liability merely because the goods were later dealt with by another licensed dealer. The dealer was also estopped from disputing the genuineness of sales already shown in its returns and from later describing them as accommodation transactions. On the facts found, suppression of material particulars justified reassessment, extended limitation and disallowance of deductions, and the Revenue&#039;s stand was upheld on all referred questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>