<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 992 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156881</link>
    <description>In FOB sales, the seller ordinarily loses insurable interest once goods are delivered to the carrier without reservation of title or lien, so a marine policy taken on a CIF basis despite an FOB transaction was treated as materially misrepresented and the insurance claim was rejected. For carrier liability, misdelivery of consolidated cargo remained actionable, but compensation was confined to the statutory package-based limit under the bill of lading and carriage regime; in the absence of declared nature and value in the bill of lading, the full value of the goods could not be recovered and the Special Drawing Rights limit applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 17:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 992 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156881</link>
      <description>In FOB sales, the seller ordinarily loses insurable interest once goods are delivered to the carrier without reservation of title or lien, so a marine policy taken on a CIF basis despite an FOB transaction was treated as materially misrepresented and the insurance claim was rejected. For carrier liability, misdelivery of consolidated cargo remained actionable, but compensation was confined to the statutory package-based limit under the bill of lading and carriage regime; in the absence of declared nature and value in the bill of lading, the full value of the goods could not be recovered and the Special Drawing Rights limit applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>