<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156880</link>
    <description>For sales-tax classification under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, the essential test is the goods&#039; dominant function and common parlance character. The appellate Tribunal&#039;s power under section 65(6) was wide enough to examine the correct applicability of entry 79 of Schedule II, Part A while deciding the dealer&#039;s appeal, and that jurisdiction was upheld. On classification, a xerox or photocopier machine was treated as a duplicating machine because its essential and sole function is copying; extra features such as enlargement or contraction did not change that character. A later amendment to entry 79 was regarded as clarificatory, reflecting the earlier position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:38:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156880</link>
      <description>For sales-tax classification under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, the essential test is the goods&#039; dominant function and common parlance character. The appellate Tribunal&#039;s power under section 65(6) was wide enough to examine the correct applicability of entry 79 of Schedule II, Part A while deciding the dealer&#039;s appeal, and that jurisdiction was upheld. On classification, a xerox or photocopier machine was treated as a duplicating machine because its essential and sole function is copying; extra features such as enlargement or contraction did not change that character. A later amendment to entry 79 was regarded as clarificatory, reflecting the earlier position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>