<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 298 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156878</link>
    <description>Bru powder was held not to fall within the entry for non-alcoholic drinks and beverages because sales tax classification depends on popular and commercial understanding, and a powder used to make a drink is not itself a drink. For the later period, Bru was treated as coffee under the specific entry covering coffee, including coffee powder, rather than the broader entry for branded non-alcoholic drinks and beverages. The specific entry prevailed over the general one because the product commercially answered the description of coffee. The assessee&#039;s classification was accepted and the higher levy under the wider entry was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:31:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 298 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156878</link>
      <description>Bru powder was held not to fall within the entry for non-alcoholic drinks and beverages because sales tax classification depends on popular and commercial understanding, and a powder used to make a drink is not itself a drink. For the later period, Bru was treated as coffee under the specific entry covering coffee, including coffee powder, rather than the broader entry for branded non-alcoholic drinks and beverages. The specific entry prevailed over the general one because the product commercially answered the description of coffee. The assessee&#039;s classification was accepted and the higher levy under the wider entry was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>