https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156876 Section 38(1) of the Osmania University Act, 1959 requires uniformity in service conditions only so far as possible, allowing flexibility where genuine administrative necessity or impracticability justifies different treatment. Because teaching and non-teaching staff are distinct categories with different service requirements, differential superannuation ages may be permissible in principle; however, no sufficient justification was shown to deny parity once the teaching staff retirement age was fixed at 60 years. On the facts, extending the same retirement age to non-teaching staff was neither impracticable nor undesirable, so parity in superannuation age was maintained. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156876 Section 38(1) of the Osmania University Act, 1959 requires uniformity in service conditions only so far as possible, allowing flexibility where genuine administrative necessity or impracticability justifies different treatment. Because teaching and non-teaching staff are distinct categories with different service requirements, differential superannuation ages may be permissible in principle; however, no sufficient justification was shown to deny parity once the teaching staff retirement age was fixed at 60 years. On the facts, extending the same retirement age to non-teaching staff was neither impracticable nor undesirable, so parity in superannuation age was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156876