<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 234 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156862</link>
    <description>A penultimate sale protected under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 does not alter the situs of a completed local sale or deem the seller to have despatched goods outside the State for purchase tax purposes. The Karnataka HC noted that section 6 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 is attracted only where the dealer himself despatches goods outside the State, and on the admitted facts the assessee sold the goods within Karnataka while the purchaser undertook the export movement. The statutory fiction safeguarding the export-linked sale therefore did not extend to the State levy, and purchase tax could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:13:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 234 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156862</link>
      <description>A penultimate sale protected under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 does not alter the situs of a completed local sale or deem the seller to have despatched goods outside the State for purchase tax purposes. The Karnataka HC noted that section 6 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 is attracted only where the dealer himself despatches goods outside the State, and on the admitted facts the assessee sold the goods within Karnataka while the purchaser undertook the export movement. The statutory fiction safeguarding the export-linked sale therefore did not extend to the State levy, and purchase tax could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>