<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 297 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156853</link>
    <description>On a limited remand for fresh determination of turnover, the assessing authority could not enhance the tax rate on cashmilon from 2 per cent to 7 per cent where the earlier rate had not been challenged by the Revenue and had attained finality. The unchallenged part of the assessment had merged in the appellate order, so the remand did not authorise reopening that concluded issue. The enhancement was therefore impermissible, and the assessee succeeded on that point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 297 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156853</link>
      <description>On a limited remand for fresh determination of turnover, the assessing authority could not enhance the tax rate on cashmilon from 2 per cent to 7 per cent where the earlier rate had not been challenged by the Revenue and had attained finality. The unchallenged part of the assessment had merged in the appellate order, so the remand did not authorise reopening that concluded issue. The enhancement was therefore impermissible, and the assessee succeeded on that point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>