<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156840</link>
    <description>A transferee or lessee deriving title from a decree-holder auction purchaser acquires only a defeasible interest, because restitution under Section 144 CPC restores parties to the position they would have occupied if the decree had not been passed. Protection available to bona fide stranger purchasers at court auctions does not extend to a decree-holder&#039;s transferee when the underlying decree is set aside. The commentary also states that tenancy protections under the Malabar Tenancy Act and the Kerala Land Reforms Act do not assist a person who entered under a lessor lacking title, especially where the occupier knew the title was precarious; the later tenancy deeming provision was not available on the relevant date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156840</link>
      <description>A transferee or lessee deriving title from a decree-holder auction purchaser acquires only a defeasible interest, because restitution under Section 144 CPC restores parties to the position they would have occupied if the decree had not been passed. Protection available to bona fide stranger purchasers at court auctions does not extend to a decree-holder&#039;s transferee when the underlying decree is set aside. The commentary also states that tenancy protections under the Malabar Tenancy Act and the Kerala Land Reforms Act do not assist a person who entered under a lessor lacking title, especially where the occupier knew the title was precarious; the later tenancy deeming provision was not available on the relevant date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>