<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156831</link>
    <description>Sales tax liability in commission agency transactions depends on the true character of the arrangement, which must be ascertained from the contract, its terms, and surrounding material rather than the label used by the parties. A commission agent may, on the facts, act in a dual capacity and effect a sale to his own account, but the question remains a mixed issue of fact and law requiring objective scrutiny of accounts and documents. A revisional authority exercising quasi-judicial power must record a reasoned factual finding on the material before it; a general approach is insufficient. The revisional order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156831</link>
      <description>Sales tax liability in commission agency transactions depends on the true character of the arrangement, which must be ascertained from the contract, its terms, and surrounding material rather than the label used by the parties. A commission agent may, on the facts, act in a dual capacity and effect a sale to his own account, but the question remains a mixed issue of fact and law requiring objective scrutiny of accounts and documents. A revisional authority exercising quasi-judicial power must record a reasoned factual finding on the material before it; a general approach is insufficient. The revisional order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>