https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156809 Price control over imported copper under the Non-ferrous Metal Control Order was treated as a reasonable restriction aimed at securing fair distribution and preventing monopoly pricing, so the price-fixing provision was sustained under Articles 19(1)(f) and 19(1)(g) read with the saving clauses. The permit machinery, however, could not operate on the basis of unpublished or unlawfully unspecified principles; without compliance with the statutory requirements for notification and laying before Parliament, clause 4 was unenforceable. The distinction between manufacturers and dealers was upheld under Article 14 because it rested on an intelligible differentia linked to equitable supply and fair pricing. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156809 Price control over imported copper under the Non-ferrous Metal Control Order was treated as a reasonable restriction aimed at securing fair distribution and preventing monopoly pricing, so the price-fixing provision was sustained under Articles 19(1)(f) and 19(1)(g) read with the saving clauses. The permit machinery, however, could not operate on the basis of unpublished or unlawfully unspecified principles; without compliance with the statutory requirements for notification and laying before Parliament, clause 4 was unenforceable. The distinction between manufacturers and dealers was upheld under Article 14 because it rested on an intelligible differentia linked to equitable supply and fair pricing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156809