<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156805</link>
    <description>Review is not justified merely because statutory provisions were not separately discussed if their consideration would not have changed the earlier conclusion, and an omission is not an error apparent unless it affects the result recorded. The commentary also states that under Article 136, the Supreme Court&#039;s power is discretionary and it is not bound to decide every jurisdictional objection once it is satisfied that no failure of justice has occurred. Special leave does not convert that discretion into a duty to pronounce on jurisdiction in every case, and the jurisdictional issue may be left open where interference is unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156805</link>
      <description>Review is not justified merely because statutory provisions were not separately discussed if their consideration would not have changed the earlier conclusion, and an omission is not an error apparent unless it affects the result recorded. The commentary also states that under Article 136, the Supreme Court&#039;s power is discretionary and it is not bound to decide every jurisdictional objection once it is satisfied that no failure of justice has occurred. Special leave does not convert that discretion into a duty to pronounce on jurisdiction in every case, and the jurisdictional issue may be left open where interference is unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>