<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 320 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156793</link>
    <description>Assessment jurisdiction remained territorial and depended on the Commissioner&#039;s allocation of work among competent assessing authorities. Service of notice in form S.T. XIV did not itself confer exclusive jurisdiction on the officer who issued it, and the dealer could not insist that only that officer conclude the assessment. Where another duly empowered territorial assessing authority actually conducted and completed the proceedings, the assessment was valid. On the stated facts, Shri R.C. Minocha was competent to pass the assessment order, and the contrary finding on jurisdiction was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 320 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156793</link>
      <description>Assessment jurisdiction remained territorial and depended on the Commissioner&#039;s allocation of work among competent assessing authorities. Service of notice in form S.T. XIV did not itself confer exclusive jurisdiction on the officer who issued it, and the dealer could not insist that only that officer conclude the assessment. Where another duly empowered territorial assessing authority actually conducted and completed the proceedings, the assessment was valid. On the stated facts, Shri R.C. Minocha was competent to pass the assessment order, and the contrary finding on jurisdiction was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>