https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156781 Article 226 does not allow a High Court to act as an appellate body over statutory transport authorities or to substitute its own view for the exercise of discretion under a complete permit scheme. Writ interference is confined to jurisdictional error, illegality, breach of natural justice, or manifest injustice, and the ordinary statutory remedies for permit grant, refusal, appeal, and revision should be pursued within the Motor Vehicles Act framework. Ownership of buses is not a condition precedent to a stage carriage permit; possession of a vehicle meeting the statutory and rule-based requirements is the material consideration, with ownership being only a relevant factor in the authority's discretion. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2023 16:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156781 Article 226 does not allow a High Court to act as an appellate body over statutory transport authorities or to substitute its own view for the exercise of discretion under a complete permit scheme. Writ interference is confined to jurisdictional error, illegality, breach of natural justice, or manifest injustice, and the ordinary statutory remedies for permit grant, refusal, appeal, and revision should be pursued within the Motor Vehicles Act framework. Ownership of buses is not a condition precedent to a stage carriage permit; possession of a vehicle meeting the statutory and rule-based requirements is the material consideration, with ownership being only a relevant factor in the authority's discretion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156781