<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156773</link>
    <description>A company was treated as a &quot;person&quot; for purposes of the land-transfer ceiling under Section 154 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, so a transfer beyond the permitted limit made without prior approval was void and the excess land vested in the State. The text also states that suppression of a material lease arrangement and related facts before the authorities and the Court disentitles a litigant to equitable relief for want of clean hands. It further notes that a board-authorised company officer and the earlier admissions on record defeated objections based on lack of authority and breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 17:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156773</link>
      <description>A company was treated as a &quot;person&quot; for purposes of the land-transfer ceiling under Section 154 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, so a transfer beyond the permitted limit made without prior approval was void and the excess land vested in the State. The text also states that suppression of a material lease arrangement and related facts before the authorities and the Court disentitles a litigant to equitable relief for want of clean hands. It further notes that a board-authorised company officer and the earlier admissions on record defeated objections based on lack of authority and breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>