<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1077 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156765</link>
    <description>Preparation, objection, finalisation and publication of the voters&#039; list for elections to the managing committee of a specified co-operative society form part of the integrated election machinery under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and Rules, so the electoral roll is an intermediate stage of the election process. Once that process has commenced, the High Court should ordinarily not entertain a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the roll, because the statutory scheme provides an election dispute remedy before the tribunal after the result is declared, including challenge for non-compliance with the Act or Rules. The challenge to the electoral roll was therefore left to the statutory election forum and writ interference was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 09:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1077 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156765</link>
      <description>Preparation, objection, finalisation and publication of the voters&#039; list for elections to the managing committee of a specified co-operative society form part of the integrated election machinery under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and Rules, so the electoral roll is an intermediate stage of the election process. Once that process has commenced, the High Court should ordinarily not entertain a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the roll, because the statutory scheme provides an election dispute remedy before the tribunal after the result is declared, including challenge for non-compliance with the Act or Rules. The challenge to the electoral roll was therefore left to the statutory election forum and writ interference was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>