<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1333 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156760</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 bars ordinary civil adjudication of title over alleged land-grab property and channels such disputes to the Special Court, so a civil suit for declaration of title was not maintainable despite the availability of review under the Act. The High Court should also not have affirmed the Special Court on the merits in a manner that could foreclose further statutory or civil remedies; the proper course was to reconsider the writ petition without pre-judging the substantive controversy. The impugned High Court judgment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1333 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156760</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 bars ordinary civil adjudication of title over alleged land-grab property and channels such disputes to the Special Court, so a civil suit for declaration of title was not maintainable despite the availability of review under the Act. The High Court should also not have affirmed the Special Court on the merits in a manner that could foreclose further statutory or civil remedies; the proper course was to reconsider the writ petition without pre-judging the substantive controversy. The impugned High Court judgment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>