https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156756 Order 39 Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure does not make an ex parte temporary injunction automatically invalid if it continues beyond thirty days; the provision requires the court to endeavour to decide the injunction application promptly and to record reasons for delay. If that timetable is not followed, the aggrieved party is not left without remedy and may challenge the subsisting order by appeal under the statutory scheme. The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should ordinarily not be used where an effective appellate remedy is available, and the statutory process should be followed first. The interim status quo was preserved pending prompt adjudication of the injunction application. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 18:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156756 Order 39 Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure does not make an ex parte temporary injunction automatically invalid if it continues beyond thirty days; the provision requires the court to endeavour to decide the injunction application promptly and to record reasons for delay. If that timetable is not followed, the aggrieved party is not left without remedy and may challenge the subsisting order by appeal under the statutory scheme. The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should ordinarily not be used where an effective appellate remedy is available, and the statutory process should be followed first. The interim status quo was preserved pending prompt adjudication of the injunction application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156756