<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 317 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156755</link>
    <description>Furniture classification under entry 121 of the First Schedule turns on common-parlance meaning, which includes furniture used in homes, offices, factories and similar places. Tables, stools, trays, racks and comparable articles specially designed for a match factory retain their character as furniture; their factory use does not convert them into factory equipment. Such goods therefore fall within the entry for furniture of all kinds not specifically mentioned, rather than the general multipoint tax provision. The assessment classification treating the articles as furniture was restored and the contrary Tribunal view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 317 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156755</link>
      <description>Furniture classification under entry 121 of the First Schedule turns on common-parlance meaning, which includes furniture used in homes, offices, factories and similar places. Tables, stools, trays, racks and comparable articles specially designed for a match factory retain their character as furniture; their factory use does not convert them into factory equipment. Such goods therefore fall within the entry for furniture of all kinds not specifically mentioned, rather than the general multipoint tax provision. The assessment classification treating the articles as furniture was restored and the contrary Tribunal view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>