https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156747 Where election law provides a post-election petition as the statutory remedy, the High Court should ordinarily not interfere under Article 226 during an ongoing election process, including at an intermediate stage involving alleged improper allotment of symbols. The governing principle is that election proceedings should not be interrupted before results are declared when the alleged irregularity can be examined by the election court in a subsequent petition. On that basis, interference with the errata notification was considered inappropriate and the writ remedy was held to be unavailable in the facts described. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156747 Where election law provides a post-election petition as the statutory remedy, the High Court should ordinarily not interfere under Article 226 during an ongoing election process, including at an intermediate stage involving alleged improper allotment of symbols. The governing principle is that election proceedings should not be interrupted before results are declared when the alleged irregularity can be examined by the election court in a subsequent petition. On that basis, interference with the errata notification was considered inappropriate and the writ remedy was held to be unavailable in the facts described. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156747