<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (11) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156734</link>
    <description>An election petition challenging rejection of a nomination paper under the Representation of the People Act is an original proceeding, so the Tribunal may examine all relevant qualifications and disqualifications under section 36(2), not only the specific objection raised before the returning officer. The scrutiny before the returning officer is summary, whereas the petition allows pleadings, issues and evidence. The document also states that High Court interference under Article 226 with interlocutory orders in election proceedings should ordinarily be declined where the Act provides an appellate remedy, because election disputes are meant to proceed expeditiously without interruption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (11) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156734</link>
      <description>An election petition challenging rejection of a nomination paper under the Representation of the People Act is an original proceeding, so the Tribunal may examine all relevant qualifications and disqualifications under section 36(2), not only the specific objection raised before the returning officer. The scrutiny before the returning officer is summary, whereas the petition allows pleadings, issues and evidence. The document also states that High Court interference under Article 226 with interlocutory orders in election proceedings should ordinarily be declined where the Act provides an appellate remedy, because election disputes are meant to proceed expeditiously without interruption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>