https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156711 A Port Trust, though exempt from rent control, remained subject to Article 14 and was required to act reasonably, in public interest, and for proper statutory purposes when evicting a tenant and reallotting a reconstituted plot. Its conduct could be judicially reviewed for arbitrariness, but the court would not substitute its own view for a possible policy choice made on relevant considerations. On the facts, allotting the reconstituted plot to the holder of the major portion for development under the town planning scheme was treated as a legitimate policy decision linked to public purpose. The challenge to the eviction and allotment therefore failed. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156711 A Port Trust, though exempt from rent control, remained subject to Article 14 and was required to act reasonably, in public interest, and for proper statutory purposes when evicting a tenant and reallotting a reconstituted plot. Its conduct could be judicially reviewed for arbitrariness, but the court would not substitute its own view for a possible policy choice made on relevant considerations. On the facts, allotting the reconstituted plot to the holder of the major portion for development under the town planning scheme was treated as a legitimate policy decision linked to public purpose. The challenge to the eviction and allotment therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156711