<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 323 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156706</link>
    <description>Rule 51 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 requires that a person likely to be affected by an appellate order be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Where an appeal concerned the validity of declaration forms affecting sales tax exemption and a related tax demand had already been raised, the affected party had a direct interest in the outcome and could not be excluded from the proceeding. The petitioner was therefore entitled to be heard before disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:07:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 323 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156706</link>
      <description>Rule 51 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 requires that a person likely to be affected by an appellate order be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Where an appeal concerned the validity of declaration forms affecting sales tax exemption and a related tax demand had already been raised, the affected party had a direct interest in the outcome and could not be excluded from the proceeding. The petitioner was therefore entitled to be heard before disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>