<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 348 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156698</link>
    <description>Liability for a transferor&#039;s sales tax arrears under section 9(1) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 arises only where the dealer&#039;s business is entirely transferred, not where only part of the assets or landed property is sold. On the facts stated, the transfer deed did not show transfer of the running business, stock-in-trade, goodwill, credits or debits, and the authorities themselves treated the transaction as a sale of land only. The purchase was for consideration and preceded notice of recovery proceedings, so it could not be treated as void under section 11AAA. In the absence of any finding fixing liability under section 9(1), attachment and recovery against the transferee&#039;s personal properties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 348 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156698</link>
      <description>Liability for a transferor&#039;s sales tax arrears under section 9(1) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 arises only where the dealer&#039;s business is entirely transferred, not where only part of the assets or landed property is sold. On the facts stated, the transfer deed did not show transfer of the running business, stock-in-trade, goodwill, credits or debits, and the authorities themselves treated the transaction as a sale of land only. The purchase was for consideration and preceded notice of recovery proceedings, so it could not be treated as void under section 11AAA. In the absence of any finding fixing liability under section 9(1), attachment and recovery against the transferee&#039;s personal properties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>