https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156666 Under COFEPOSA, the maximum detention period is reckoned from the date of actual detention, not from the date of the detention order, and parole ordinarily does not interrupt that running period because the detenu remains in constructive custody unless the parole terms or rules say otherwise. Where a detention order is later quashed and then restored on appeal, re-detention for the balance period is not automatic; it depends on whether a proximate temporal nexus with the original detention purpose still exists and whether the statutory maximum has not expired. If a long lapse has occurred and the maximum period is over, further detention is not justified. en-us Wed, 16 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156666 Under COFEPOSA, the maximum detention period is reckoned from the date of actual detention, not from the date of the detention order, and parole ordinarily does not interrupt that running period because the detenu remains in constructive custody unless the parole terms or rules say otherwise. Where a detention order is later quashed and then restored on appeal, re-detention for the balance period is not automatic; it depends on whether a proximate temporal nexus with the original detention purpose still exists and whether the statutory maximum has not expired. If a long lapse has occurred and the maximum period is over, further detention is not justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156666