https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156649 Preventive detention orders are ordinarily not quashed before execution, because judicial review under Article 226 is limited at the pre-execution stage to narrowly defined exceptions such as lack of authority, wrong person, wrong law, vague or irrelevant grounds, or wrong purpose. The detaining authority's satisfaction remains subjective, and the Court will not reappraise the merits or sufficiency of the grounds unless one of those exceptions is clearly shown. Allegations of custodial violence, a pending inquiry, and parallel criminal proceedings did not establish any recognised exception on the facts, so the pre-execution challenge failed and the detention order was left open to execution. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2015 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156649 Preventive detention orders are ordinarily not quashed before execution, because judicial review under Article 226 is limited at the pre-execution stage to narrowly defined exceptions such as lack of authority, wrong person, wrong law, vague or irrelevant grounds, or wrong purpose. The detaining authority's satisfaction remains subjective, and the Court will not reappraise the merits or sufficiency of the grounds unless one of those exceptions is clearly shown. Allegations of custodial violence, a pending inquiry, and parallel criminal proceedings did not establish any recognised exception on the facts, so the pre-execution challenge failed and the detention order was left open to execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156649