<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 320 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156639</link>
    <description>Amounts collected from purchasers at the time of sale, though described as molasses transport and handling charges, were treated as part of the sale consideration and taxable turnover because they were not proved to be freight for transport or independent post-sale service fees. The assessee produced no vouchers or accounts showing lorry hire or separately chargeable services, and the claim for exclusion under rule 6(g) therefore failed. The article states that the wide statutory concept of turnover includes sums charged by the dealer whatever their description, name, or object, when they form part of the sale receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:29:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 320 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156639</link>
      <description>Amounts collected from purchasers at the time of sale, though described as molasses transport and handling charges, were treated as part of the sale consideration and taxable turnover because they were not proved to be freight for transport or independent post-sale service fees. The assessee produced no vouchers or accounts showing lorry hire or separately chargeable services, and the claim for exclusion under rule 6(g) therefore failed. The article states that the wide statutory concept of turnover includes sums charged by the dealer whatever their description, name, or object, when they form part of the sale receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>