<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 408 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156625</link>
    <description>Under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, the inclusive definition of &quot;business&quot; in the term &quot;dealer&quot; was construed broadly and was not limited by the exclusion of newspapers from &quot;goods&quot;. Business activity connected with newspaper publication did not cease to be &quot;business&quot; merely because newspapers themselves were not taxable as goods. Reading the definitions of &quot;dealer&quot; and &quot;business&quot; together did not justify a narrower construction, as that would effectively rewrite the statute and create an unintended route to avoid tax on purchase turnover. The dealer was therefore treated as falling within the definition of dealer in relation to its purchase activity connected with newspaper publication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:32:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 408 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156625</link>
      <description>Under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, the inclusive definition of &quot;business&quot; in the term &quot;dealer&quot; was construed broadly and was not limited by the exclusion of newspapers from &quot;goods&quot;. Business activity connected with newspaper publication did not cease to be &quot;business&quot; merely because newspapers themselves were not taxable as goods. Reading the definitions of &quot;dealer&quot; and &quot;business&quot; together did not justify a narrower construction, as that would effectively rewrite the statute and create an unintended route to avoid tax on purchase turnover. The dealer was therefore treated as falling within the definition of dealer in relation to its purchase activity connected with newspaper publication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>