<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 334 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156620</link>
    <description>Access to a clearing agent&#039;s statement was treated as adequate where the assessee was allowed to inspect it and no timely objection or prejudice was raised; the plea of denial of reasonable opportunity was rejected. Wheat turnover was sustained in tax because the assessing authority relied on the statement, assessment records and surrounding materials, and the assessee had not earlier disputed the consignment link. Exemption on purchases was also withdrawn because the dealers were found fictitious and non-existent, and the assessee failed to prove that the suppliers were real and existing persons. The revisional challenge therefore failed and the assessment additions and withdrawal of exemption were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 334 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156620</link>
      <description>Access to a clearing agent&#039;s statement was treated as adequate where the assessee was allowed to inspect it and no timely objection or prejudice was raised; the plea of denial of reasonable opportunity was rejected. Wheat turnover was sustained in tax because the assessing authority relied on the statement, assessment records and surrounding materials, and the assessee had not earlier disputed the consignment link. Exemption on purchases was also withdrawn because the dealers were found fictitious and non-existent, and the assessee failed to prove that the suppliers were real and existing persons. The revisional challenge therefore failed and the assessment additions and withdrawal of exemption were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>