<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 356 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156612</link>
    <description>Section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act permits reassessment only for escaped turnover under section 16(1)(a) or for turnover assessed at a lower rate under section 16(1)(b). The text states that a successor assessing authority cannot use section 16 to reopen a concluded assessment on the footing of under-assessment or to exercise revisional powers not conferred by the statute. The proper revisional route is section 32, and the later special provision in section 12-A had no application to the assessment year concerned. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s setting aside of the reassessment was upheld and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 356 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156612</link>
      <description>Section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act permits reassessment only for escaped turnover under section 16(1)(a) or for turnover assessed at a lower rate under section 16(1)(b). The text states that a successor assessing authority cannot use section 16 to reopen a concluded assessment on the footing of under-assessment or to exercise revisional powers not conferred by the statute. The proper revisional route is section 32, and the later special provision in section 12-A had no application to the assessment year concerned. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s setting aside of the reassessment was upheld and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>