<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 323 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156608</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petitions, ruling that drilling tube-wells does not constitute the manufacturing of water. The petitioners&#039; claim for concessional rates on goods was rejected, and the validity of orders by the Sales Tax Officer and revisional authority was upheld. The issue of retrospective deletion in the registration certificate and penalty proceedings was left for the petitioners to address before the relevant authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 323 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156608</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petitions, ruling that drilling tube-wells does not constitute the manufacturing of water. The petitioners&#039; claim for concessional rates on goods was rejected, and the validity of orders by the Sales Tax Officer and revisional authority was upheld. The issue of retrospective deletion in the registration certificate and penalty proceedings was left for the petitioners to address before the relevant authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>