https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156607 Allegations in the FIR and investigation material were required to be accepted as true at the quashing stage, and they prima facie disclosed offences under Sections 406 and 494 IPC because the complaint alleged a second marriage, misappropriation of dowry articles, and cruelty; the truth of those assertions and proof of essential marriage ceremonies were matters for trial, not for quashing. The High Court also should not have quashed the charge sheet under Section 482 CrPC before the Magistrate applied mind under Sections 190 and 239; the statutory process had to run its course, so the criminal proceedings were restored. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156607 Allegations in the FIR and investigation material were required to be accepted as true at the quashing stage, and they prima facie disclosed offences under Sections 406 and 494 IPC because the complaint alleged a second marriage, misappropriation of dowry articles, and cruelty; the truth of those assertions and proof of essential marriage ceremonies were matters for trial, not for quashing. The High Court also should not have quashed the charge sheet under Section 482 CrPC before the Magistrate applied mind under Sections 190 and 239; the statutory process had to run its course, so the criminal proceedings were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156607