<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156598</link>
    <description>Pre-execution judicial review of a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 is confined to narrowly recognised grounds, such as absence of statutory authority, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague or irrelevant material; the list cannot be expanded. Allegations of assault, illegal detention, and delayed production before the Magistrate were disputed factual matters and did not, by themselves, establish a wrong purpose or invalidate the order. Delay in execution may support an inference of punitive detention in an appropriate case, but no such inference arose where the delay was linked to the detenue&#039;s own challenge and alleged evasion of service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156598</link>
      <description>Pre-execution judicial review of a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 is confined to narrowly recognised grounds, such as absence of statutory authority, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague or irrelevant material; the list cannot be expanded. Allegations of assault, illegal detention, and delayed production before the Magistrate were disputed factual matters and did not, by themselves, establish a wrong purpose or invalidate the order. Delay in execution may support an inference of punitive detention in an appropriate case, but no such inference arose where the delay was linked to the detenue&#039;s own challenge and alleged evasion of service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>