<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 163 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156585</link>
    <description>Section 18A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 does not make penalty automatic for every contravention of section 18; the assessing authority must exercise judicial discretion and consider the surrounding circumstances and the dealer&#039;s conduct. Applying that principle, excess tax collection caused by a bona fide mutual mistake about the applicable rate, without deliberate intent to enrich the dealer, did not justify levy of penalty at the full excess amount. The penalty was therefore not sustainable on the facts and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 163 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156585</link>
      <description>Section 18A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 does not make penalty automatic for every contravention of section 18; the assessing authority must exercise judicial discretion and consider the surrounding circumstances and the dealer&#039;s conduct. Applying that principle, excess tax collection caused by a bona fide mutual mistake about the applicable rate, without deliberate intent to enrich the dealer, did not justify levy of penalty at the full excess amount. The penalty was therefore not sustainable on the facts and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>