https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156580 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the respondents had entered into a concluded contract with the Bareilly Development Authority (BDA), which included clauses permitting changes in terms and conditions. The Court found the High Court's interference under Article 226 of the Constitution inappropriate in this contractual matter. The respondents were advised to approach the BDA for correction of any clerical errors in calculations and were free to seek other legal remedies if entitled. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156580 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court's judgment. It held that the respondents had entered into a concluded contract with the Bareilly Development Authority (BDA), which included clauses permitting changes in terms and conditions. The Court found the High Court's interference under Article 226 of the Constitution inappropriate in this contractual matter. The respondents were advised to approach the BDA for correction of any clerical errors in calculations and were free to seek other legal remedies if entitled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156580