<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 330 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156577</link>
    <description>Penalty for non-payment of sales tax could not stand where the relevant legal position for the assessment year was that meals served in hotels and restaurants were not taxable. The dealer&#039;s returns may have shown a liability, but once the underlying sales tax was not legally due, there was no existing tax default on which penalty could be computed or imposed. The penalty was therefore unsustainable, and deletion of the penalty was upheld in favour of the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 330 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156577</link>
      <description>Penalty for non-payment of sales tax could not stand where the relevant legal position for the assessment year was that meals served in hotels and restaurants were not taxable. The dealer&#039;s returns may have shown a liability, but once the underlying sales tax was not legally due, there was no existing tax default on which penalty could be computed or imposed. The penalty was therefore unsustainable, and deletion of the penalty was upheld in favour of the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>