https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156566 Preventive detention permits pre-execution judicial interference only in narrow exceptional cases, such as lack of power, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague or extraneous grounds. The Court held that the detention order was not vulnerable on the ground that the District Magistrate lacked authority, because a valid empowering notification was in force when the order was made; a reference to an earlier notification did not invalidate it. The challenge based on delay and stale objections also failed, particularly where service was avoided and earlier challenges had been pursued unsuccessfully or withdrawn. Pre-execution quashing was therefore not warranted. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Mar 2014 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156566 Preventive detention permits pre-execution judicial interference only in narrow exceptional cases, such as lack of power, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague or extraneous grounds. The Court held that the detention order was not vulnerable on the ground that the District Magistrate lacked authority, because a valid empowering notification was in force when the order was made; a reference to an earlier notification did not invalidate it. The challenge based on delay and stale objections also failed, particularly where service was avoided and earlier challenges had been pursued unsuccessfully or withdrawn. Pre-execution quashing was therefore not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156566