<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 349 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156563</link>
    <description>Internal transfer of paper from one unit of the same dealer to another for manufacture of exercise books was not, by itself, a contravention of the resale declaration under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The court treated such movement as an internal shifting of goods, not a sale to a different person; the position on printing of books depended on further factual inquiry because the transaction might be a sale of paper or a job contract. The Tribunal also erred by not deciding the real controversy on the materials already available and by remitting the matter instead of exercising its jurisdiction to determine liability; the assessment issue was therefore directed to be reheard and decided afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 349 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156563</link>
      <description>Internal transfer of paper from one unit of the same dealer to another for manufacture of exercise books was not, by itself, a contravention of the resale declaration under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The court treated such movement as an internal shifting of goods, not a sale to a different person; the position on printing of books depended on further factual inquiry because the transaction might be a sale of paper or a job contract. The Tribunal also erred by not deciding the real controversy on the materials already available and by remitting the matter instead of exercising its jurisdiction to determine liability; the assessment issue was therefore directed to be reheard and decided afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>