<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 384 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156560</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, directing the second respondent to issue a sales tax deferment certificate for the period between 31st March 1982 and 30th March 1988. The respondents were also ordered to refund the sales tax amount paid by the petitioner during this period. The Court applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, ensuring the Government could not retract its promise, thereby upholding the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 16:11:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 384 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156560</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, directing the second respondent to issue a sales tax deferment certificate for the period between 31st March 1982 and 30th March 1988. The respondents were also ordered to refund the sales tax amount paid by the petitioner during this period. The Court applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, ensuring the Government could not retract its promise, thereby upholding the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to the benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>