https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156527 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act was upheld because the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was based on relevant material, including the incident, bail history, and surrounding circumstances. Judicial review was confined to whether the grounds were germane to the statutory object, and the High Court was found to have substituted its own assessment for that of the authority. The Court also held that delay did not by itself snap the nexus between the alleged prejudicial activity and detention where the delay resulted from evasion of arrest and interim judicial protection. The quashing order was set aside and the detention order stood revived. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156527 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act was upheld because the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was based on relevant material, including the incident, bail history, and surrounding circumstances. Judicial review was confined to whether the grounds were germane to the statutory object, and the High Court was found to have substituted its own assessment for that of the authority. The Court also held that delay did not by itself snap the nexus between the alleged prejudicial activity and detention where the delay resulted from evasion of arrest and interim judicial protection. The quashing order was set aside and the detention order stood revived. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156527