<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 426 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156519</link>
    <description>An ex parte decree cannot stand unless the plaintiff proves the pleaded case with reliable and admissible evidence, even where the defendant remains absent. The plaintiff&#039;s sole witness failed to establish the pleaded version, and later affidavit material could not cure the deficiency because affidavit evidence is not substantive evidence except as permitted by the Code of Civil Procedure. Where the recorded evidence shows the claim is not established and further factual issues may arise, retrial may be ordered in the interest of justice. The High Court&#039;s orders were set aside and the suit was remanded for fresh disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 426 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156519</link>
      <description>An ex parte decree cannot stand unless the plaintiff proves the pleaded case with reliable and admissible evidence, even where the defendant remains absent. The plaintiff&#039;s sole witness failed to establish the pleaded version, and later affidavit material could not cure the deficiency because affidavit evidence is not substantive evidence except as permitted by the Code of Civil Procedure. Where the recorded evidence shows the claim is not established and further factual issues may arise, retrial may be ordered in the interest of justice. The High Court&#039;s orders were set aside and the suit was remanded for fresh disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>