https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156516 The court upheld the dismissal of a former police constable who was found guilty of serious misconduct and indisciplinary actions, including unauthorized absence, sending letters to superiors advocating fasting, and fasting at a temple against police discipline. The appellant's admission of facts was considered an admission of guilt, leading to the affirmation of his dismissal. The court differentiated between admission of facts and admission of guilt, emphasizing the importance of clear communication regarding leave extensions in the police force. Despite dismissing the appeal, the court did not award costs against the appellant, considering his personal beliefs and motivations. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156516 The court upheld the dismissal of a former police constable who was found guilty of serious misconduct and indisciplinary actions, including unauthorized absence, sending letters to superiors advocating fasting, and fasting at a temple against police discipline. The appellant's admission of facts was considered an admission of guilt, leading to the affirmation of his dismissal. The court differentiated between admission of facts and admission of guilt, emphasizing the importance of clear communication regarding leave extensions in the police force. Despite dismissing the appeal, the court did not award costs against the appellant, considering his personal beliefs and motivations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156516