https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156505 The court allowed the writ petition challenging a notification under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which discriminated against petitioners by exempting a cooperative from tax, creating unfair competition. The court found the notification violated Article 14, impeded inter-State trade, and did not serve public interest. Comparisons with similar cases supported the decision to quash the notification, emphasizing its discriminatory nature. The court highlighted the need for future compliance with legal standards and upheld the decision to strike down the impugned notification, with no costs awarded to either party. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:14:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156505 The court allowed the writ petition challenging a notification under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which discriminated against petitioners by exempting a cooperative from tax, creating unfair competition. The court found the notification violated Article 14, impeded inter-State trade, and did not serve public interest. Comparisons with similar cases supported the decision to quash the notification, emphasizing its discriminatory nature. The court highlighted the need for future compliance with legal standards and upheld the decision to strike down the impugned notification, with no costs awarded to either party. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 27 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156505