<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 369 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156481</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order dated August 25, 1983, and directed the State to refund the enhanced tender form fee paid by the petitioners. The court held that the fee increase was arbitrary, unreasonable, and violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. Additionally, the court found that the fee amounted to a tax imposed without legislative authority, rendering it unsustainable. The writ petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 369 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156481</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order dated August 25, 1983, and directed the State to refund the enhanced tender form fee paid by the petitioners. The court held that the fee increase was arbitrary, unreasonable, and violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. Additionally, the court found that the fee amounted to a tax imposed without legislative authority, rendering it unsustainable. The writ petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>