<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1142 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156480</link>
    <description>A domestic disciplinary enquiry was treated as valid where the charge-sheet was specific, notices and opportunities were given, and the employee admitted the misconduct in writing; the alleged presence of the company lawyer as enquiry officer, denial of documents, legal representation and cross-examination did not by itself establish breach of natural justice. Interference by the Industrial Tribunal and High Court was found unwarranted because the matter had been decided again on the same evidence and no perversity in the concurrent findings was shown. Dismissal for insubordination, abusive language and conduct undermining discipline was held not to be shockingly disproportionate, and the dismissal was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1142 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156480</link>
      <description>A domestic disciplinary enquiry was treated as valid where the charge-sheet was specific, notices and opportunities were given, and the employee admitted the misconduct in writing; the alleged presence of the company lawyer as enquiry officer, denial of documents, legal representation and cross-examination did not by itself establish breach of natural justice. Interference by the Industrial Tribunal and High Court was found unwarranted because the matter had been decided again on the same evidence and no perversity in the concurrent findings was shown. Dismissal for insubordination, abusive language and conduct undermining discipline was held not to be shockingly disproportionate, and the dismissal was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>