https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156474 Appellate interference with a single judge's refusal to grant writ relief against a sales tax assessment and recovery steps is justified only where the writ discretion was exercised arbitrarily, perversely, or in a clearly wrong manner. A mere possibility of a different view on the same facts does not warrant reversal. The existence of a pending statutory appeal and stay application also reduced immediate prejudice, as the assessee could pursue the remedy under the sales tax statute. The appellate court therefore declined to interfere with the dismissal of the writ petition and left the refusal of relief undisturbed. en-us Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:23:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156474 Appellate interference with a single judge's refusal to grant writ relief against a sales tax assessment and recovery steps is justified only where the writ discretion was exercised arbitrarily, perversely, or in a clearly wrong manner. A mere possibility of a different view on the same facts does not warrant reversal. The existence of a pending statutory appeal and stay application also reduced immediate prejudice, as the assessee could pursue the remedy under the sales tax statute. The appellate court therefore declined to interfere with the dismissal of the writ petition and left the refusal of relief undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156474