<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156473</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial tax officer cannot be subjected to disciplinary action merely because an assessment order is later found erroneous in appeal. The assessment function under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act is corrected through the statutory appellate and revisional hierarchy, not by departmental punishment for a simple mistake, inadvertence, or omission. Disciplinary proceedings become justified only where the officer&#039;s conduct shows dishonesty, recklessness, grave negligence, lack of good faith, or misconduct. Once the initiation of proceedings was unsustainable, the stoppage of increment and the consequential administrative order had no legal basis and were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 277 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156473</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial tax officer cannot be subjected to disciplinary action merely because an assessment order is later found erroneous in appeal. The assessment function under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act is corrected through the statutory appellate and revisional hierarchy, not by departmental punishment for a simple mistake, inadvertence, or omission. Disciplinary proceedings become justified only where the officer&#039;s conduct shows dishonesty, recklessness, grave negligence, lack of good faith, or misconduct. Once the initiation of proceedings was unsustainable, the stoppage of increment and the consequential administrative order had no legal basis and were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>